»Notes«: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
| OlafLangmack (talk | contribs) No edit summary | OlafLangmack (talk | contribs)  No edit summary | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| [[de:»Notizen«]] | [[de:»Notizen«]] | ||
| [[:Category:Week_01|01]] | [[:Category:Week_01|01]] | ||
| [[:Category:Week_02|02]] | [[:Category:Week_02|02]] | ||
| Line 69: | Line 67: | ||
| ==From the explanatory report== | ==From the explanatory report== | ||
| ''Contemporaneous notes'' are admissible in civil proceedings (in the U.S.) as evidence of the facts of a conversation, observation, or interaction between individuals. This was made known to the world in 2017 by then-FBI Director James Comey, who compiled them from his personal conversations with the then-President. Contemporaneous notes created by a person themselves create a store of conceivable evidence, until there is a claim their creator is using them to refute or prove.   | In 2010, then Google Chairman Eric Schmidt: »If you have [[Simulation stimulates#Private language|something]] that you don't want anyone to know, maybe you shouldn't be doing it in the first place.« <ref name="PRIVACY" /> ''Contemporaneous notes'' are admissible in civil proceedings (in the U.S.) as evidence of the facts of a conversation, observation, or interaction between individuals. This was made known to the world in 2017 by then-FBI Director James Comey, who compiled them from his personal conversations with the then-President. Contemporaneous notes created by a person themselves create a store of conceivable evidence, until there is a claim their creator is using them to refute or prove.   | ||
| ==Source== | ==Source== | ||
